Donor lungs
from heavy smokers 'safe for transplantation'
The lungs
of individuals who have a smoking history of 20 pack years - the equivalent to
smoking one pack a day for 20 years - are usually deemed ineligible for
donation. But new research suggests that transplanting lungs from heavy-smoking
donors does not affect patient outcomes after surgery.
This is according to a study
recently published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
The
research team, including Dr. Anton Sabashnikov of the Royal Brompton &
Harefield Hospital in the UK, analyzed data of 237 patients who underwent lung
transplantation at Harefield Hospital between 2007 and 2012.
Characteristics
of both patients and donors were assessed, as well as patient outcomes
following transplantations.
The
lung transplant patients were split into three groups:
§ Patients who were transplanted with lungs from smoking
donors (less than 20 pack years)
§ Patients who were transplanted with lungs from heavy-smoking
donors (more than 20 pack years), and
§ Patients who were transplanted with lungs from non-smoking
donors.
The
investigators say that all patients had comparable characteristics at the
baseline of the study, and they excluded patients who were transplanted with
lungs from donors with an unknown smoking history.
However,
they note that heavy-smoking donors were much older than non-smoking and
smoking donors.
The
analysis revealed that patients transplanted with lungs from donors who smoked
or were heavy smokers did not experience any severe negative outcomes following
surgery, compared with patients transplanted with lungs from donors who did not
smoke.
The
United Network for Organ Sharing states that there were 1,763 lungs donated for
transplantation in the US last year. But there continues to be a shortage
relative to the number of lung transplantations required. According to Dr.
Sabashnikov, these findings show that using donor lungs from heavy smokers
could be a way of tackling this shortage.
Source:
www.medicalnewstoday.com
28.02.2014
Passive
smoking 'increases risk of miscarriage, stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy'
Past
research has linked passive smoking to an increased risk of obesity, diabetes
and even hearing loss. Now, a new study suggests that exposure to secondhand
smoke may increase a woman's risk of miscarriage, stillbirth and ectopic
pregnancy.
The study findings were recently
published online in the journal Tobacco Control - a journal of
the BMJ.
In
their background information of the study, the researchers note that smoking
during pregnancy can increase the risk of miscarriage and birth complications.
But they point out that it is unclear as to whether passive smoking can have a
similar impact. To find out, the investigators analyzed data from 80,762 women
who were a part of the Women's Health Initiative Observation Study.
All women had been pregnant at least
once and had gone through menopause.
Of
these women, 5,082 (6.3%) were current smokers, 34,830 were former smokers
(smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime) and 40,850 were
never-smokers (had not smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime). The
women who were never-smokers were split into groups dependent on the levels of
secondhand smoke they were exposed to as a child, as an adult at home and as an
adult at work.
Of
all the women in the study, 26,307 (32.6%) reported having a miscarriage at
least once, while 3,552 (4.4%) had a stillbirth and 2,033 (2.5%) experienced a
tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Women
who had ever smoked during their reproductive years were 44% more likely to
have a stillborn child, 43% more likely to have an ectopic pregnancy and 16%
more likely to miscarry, compared with never-smokers.
However,
the researchers found that never-smokers who had been exposed to secondhand
smoke also had a significantly higher risk of stillbirth, miscarriage and
ectopic pregnancy, compared with never-smokers who had not been exposed to
secondhand smoke.
Furthermore,
the investigators found that the longer these never-smokers had been exposed to
secondhand smoke, the greater their risk.
Source:
www.medicalnewstoday.com
28.02.2014
Don’t
live your life impressing others, live your life impressing yourself
No comments:
Post a Comment